No monetary compensation is/was involved before, during, and after the period of creation of this review. The treble rolls off pretty early, and is on the darker side. There's not much air and sparkle, so trebleheads might want to look elsewhere. The treble is hence fatigue-free and smooth, with minimal sibilance, though resolution and micro-details might be dampened due to this tuning choice. Preface: I bought every single headphone and iem including this one with my own money. I have been a casual "audiophile" for about 10 years and seeing how the hobby has changed over this period of time, especially recently is just insane. I will only be reviewing the sound(build is fine too, great even)

Pairing :just plug it to your phone and enjoy, tho i must mention that technical scalability on this IEMs is not that great This unit was sent to me by Tangzu themselves in exchange for an honest, unbiased review. Rest assured that this review will be free from any bias/es as much as possible. The IEMs are extremely light and I find them very comfortable also, being able to completely forget about them while wearing them for extended periods.The bass is well drawn out and deep reaching, with a sense of heft that will satisfy bass lovers in its own way. The Tangzu WA NER is a surprisingly well-tuned, V-shaped iem with an agreeable slightly warm tonality but middling technicalities. It could deserve a bit more sheen. Overall a reasonably pleasant listening experience despite its low price. It sits somewhere in between the Truthear Hola and the 7hz Salnotes Zero, differences between the 3 are minor but noticeable in my opinion.

Wan'er was responsible for handling imperial documents and was also well known as a poet. She even continued her royal capacity when Wu Zetian's son (Emperor Zhongzong) inherited the throne subsequently. The Soundstage is above average for this price point, specifically on the width. The height and depth are average, still a good bargain for the price. im a neutral kinda guy with more emphasis on technicalities. how about instruments saperation and low to mids tonal/texture. can you comment/compare these two aspects on both iems? Timbre is slightly less natural on the Zero, and the Zero's fit is more uncomfortable due to the perpendicular edges in the shells.Gaming: I would recommend this set to be used in immersive gaming, as in narrative and action single/multi player content, literally contrasting it with not being suitable for competitive online first person shooters. The extra warmth may indeed bring out the feeling of being drawn into the game, which is also a perk for watching movies, nevertheless it becomes deleterious when trying to isolate and pinpoint footsteps in competitive FPS. It is still suitable for FPS games if you are not playing competitively. Eartips: It all has the eartips you need included but you can always use your preferred eartips. Tip: try Final E eartips for pleasing results. use not following the ‘User Guide’ or any additional safety, use, or warnings included in the product materials. The Tangzu Wan'er SG is a loaner unit from my friend and the review is my personal opinion for this IEM. The included cable is a 5N OFC 4 braided cable. It is thin and tangles easily, with some microphonics (and no chin cinch), but I've seen pricier IEMs still retailing with non-detachable cables in this day and age. Thus, it is a nice touch that for such a cheap IEM, the Wan'er comes with a detachable cable with a 2 pin connector.

Treble is similar but Zeros might be a bit more treble also sound splashier. Then again it might also be contributed to the higher amount of bass on Wan’er is balancing out the treble more evenly. Timbre is slightly better on the BL-03. In technical performance, the soundstage of the BL-03 is slightly more expansive, but micro-detailing, imaging and instrument separation are better on the Wan'er. Vocals are well presented, with clarity being good although I do feel that things like Monica Naranjo in “ Sobreviviré” could take just one step further forwards, the same goes for Eric Clapton in “ Tears In Heaven”. Having said that, they are not bad in this regard, far from it, I just feel that this is not the strongest point of the Wan’er. Timbral and tonal characteristics of Wan'er S.G being highly organic and musical. End to end from lower frequency to the uppermost region, it is faithfully natural sounding and realistic. The only caveat I would complain would be the strength and depth of timbre imaging which can appear a bit fuzzy (due to preferences for overall smoothness). It is neither warm nor it is bright - just about right. The sort of natural tone and timbre to be heard from the likes of Shure KSE1500, Kinera Idun Golden or Sennheiser HD600 - of course the said devices being highly superior to the actual implementation - but you get the idea, Wan'er S.G hovers close to those sort of sound. It is non-offensive, smooth and flowing. No hint of being digital-ish or metallic - in my book, this is highly favorable to my taste subjectively.Details and separation? Apart from chu this is the most detailed songs have ever been. Even then I think it tends to have more details in bass so overall, very very good. None of the frequencies are masking each other. """""speed""""" of the driver is more than fine In the upper ranges, the extension is not terrible although it is not amazing either. There is enough extension for it not to give the impression of being rolled off in these upper ranges but a tiny bit more air would have been a positive. Again, this is something that is not an issue, remember these are a set of 20€ IEMs and are more impressive in these ranges than many other more expensive sets. Just like Yuan Li and Zetian Wu, despite being rated 20 Ohm with 107dB of sensitivity. Wan'er S.G scales really well with power. Yes is does sound already good directly connected to my Sony Xperia 1 iV, the output being rich and highly musical. Subjecting Wan'er S.G to higher powered partners will help to improve some technical aspects like stronger imaging and crisper note weight. Wan'er S.G seems to work really amazing with Cayin RU6, CEntrance DACport HD and Ovidius B1 - with technical element being heightened audibly. Worth to mention that Wan'er S.G remained stable with all the power fed into it without any hint of getting shouty. I'm trying my best not to hop blindfolded here on the hype train but man it's chugging. The wan'er is neutral and smooth. it plays every sound that's thrown at it. Plays it well. What more can you ask for?

However you will be trading off Wan'ers' most precious perks that you won't find on the Zero: the musicality and smoothness of the tuning, becoming way less fatiguing than the Zero. You can throw anything at it and it will sound engaging, rich sounding and fun whilst not compromising a natural timbre and correctness. This allied to a comfortable fit, the Wan'er wins in terms of versatility and qualifies better for an all rounder daily driver. Smartphone Daily Use: the sets' timbre is natural so all voice calls, interface sounds and video reproductions will be accurate.The Salnotes Zero has less bass quantities, but the bass is cleaner and tighter. Transients, micro-details, soundstage, instrument separation and clarity are better on the Zero, but the Zero has a harsher and more sibilant treble. The Tangzu wan'er SG IEM's soundstage is average. While the soundstage is not as large as some of the higher-end IEMs, it still provides a fun experience. The Tangzu wan'er SG IEM's technicalities are average, but that doesn't mean that it's not a great choice for audiophiles. The IEM provides you with a clear and precise sound, and it has a decent amount of detail. Even though the IEM has a good level of detail, you can still distinguish between different instruments with ease. The Tangzu wan'er SG IEM has a decent soundstage, providing you with a wide sound. The Tangzu wan'er SG IEM has a good imaging as well, which makes it easy to understand.