In eleven brief but science-laden chapters, Pang presents convincing evidence that much of our world can be understood from the perspective of tiny molecules, particle waves, and the laws of thermodynamics. But most of it is a long, laborious slog - it's all relevant and important to the author, but the metaphors and models won't necessarily make sense to anyone else. Pang's application of scientific metaphors starts off poorly by relying on outdated theories or unquestioned folk psychology.

I respect the author and can imagine this would feel very special and personal to her, but for me it’s been really difficult to read: I find myself rolling my eyes at some of the metaphors and clichés and I just don’t think it’s a particularly well written book. Oft auch mit Humor und Witz erzählt Pang von den vielen Fettnäpfchen, in die sie als Autistin mit ADHS in ihrem Leben schon gestolpert ist.

They're hugely detailed and complex in places, and did little to enhance my understanding or my own coping mechanisms. I think my biggest issue with this book, and why it was so disappointing, is that it just felt marketed wrong. Unfortunately there’s little sign of the wisdom that other autistic authors have brought to the page- this reads more like it was written by someone who knows a great deal of scientific facts (and likes to talk about it), but has little life experience. She found it very interesting and enjoyable, and always loves hearing about other amazing people with ASD and what they.

She made me think about my life differently and in a way that makes me feel like I can take on the challenge of the human experience. There is so much to learn from what we see and what we don’t see as people, and my unique perspective can shed light on previously overlooked connections. Each chapter takes a specific social problem and analyses it using scientific metaphors, from machine learning to proteins, refraction to ergodic theory. Learning about ergodicity helped me to see that the human obsession with stereotypes is one of our most harmful traits.I loved how relatable this book was and even though I did not know a lot of the science that she talked about, she wrote it in a way that was compelling and made me self reflect.

I don’t know how a PhD in biochemistry gives Dr Pang the credentials to dispense psychiatric advice, nor how advice along the lines of “become a prism to refract your fears and anxieties so you can understand and cope with them” is anything more than a deepity cloaked in pseudoscientific babble. Camilla Pang ne arată cum putem să înțelegem oamenii și legăturile care se formează între ei cu ajutorul științei. I think there are some really long winded attempts at making something out of nothing, or creating links and thinking they're special.Când două personalități umane reușesc să conlucreze într-un mod care le ajută să se ridice la un nivel la care nu ar fi ajuns niciodată singure, înseamnă că au aceeași „frecvență de rezonanță”. While I’m not on the spectrum and am not as neurodivergent as Pang, I do have clinical depression, atypical social behaviors, and experience some common emotions differently or not at all compared to the general population. Previous winners include Stephen Hawking – a childhood hero of Pang’s, who read A Brief History of Time at the age of eight. However, it seems like she battles through life with an air of adventure and positivity, so, if you’ve ever felt like you’ve been born on the wrong planet, you may find this book rather uplifting.

Box-like thinking is deductive and constrained whereas tree-like thinking is inductive and expansive. An easy-to-read part-memoir, part-explanation of why humans are the way they are and what we can learn from it - Refinery29 You may also be interested in.

D. in biochemistry, and takes a delightfully analytical approach to deconstructing and explaining human behavior.